Re: ordering of suspend/resume for devices. any clues, anyone?

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Dec 15 2005 - 13:37:10 EST


On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:31:24PM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> [hi, please kindly cc me direct as i am deliberately subscribed with
> settings to not receive posts from this list, but if that is inconvenient
> for you to cc me, don't worry i can always look up the archives
> to keep track of replies, thank you.]
>
> http://handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/BlueAngel
>
> works.
>
> am seeking some advice regarding power management - specifically
> the ordering of devices "resume" functions being called.
>
> we have an LCD, and an ATI chip. switching on the LCD powers up
> the ATI chip.
>
> unfortunately, resume calls the ATI device initialisation
> _before_ the LCD resume initialisation. the ATI chip's
> initialisation fails - naturally - because it's not even
> powered up.
>
> of course - this can't be taken care of in userspace as an apm
> event because the framebuffer device cannot be a module [without
> terminating all running x-applications].
>
> so.
>
> possible solutions, as i see them:

<snip>

Known issue, I'd take this to the linux-pm mailing list instead, as the
people there are working on stuff for this.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/