RE: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

[James Bottomley]

On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:45 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> There was a USENIX paper a couple of decades ago that described how
> to do a fast s/w disable of interrupts on machines where really disabling
> interrupts was expensive.  The rough gist was that the spl[1-7]()
> functions would just set a flag in memory to hold the desired interrupt
> mask.  If an interrupt actually occurred when it was s/w blocked, the
> handler would set a pending flag, and just rfi with interrupts disabled.
> Then the splx() code checked to see whether there was a pending interrupt
> and dealt with it if there was.

Would you believe that that paper was written about the NCR Voyager
architecture (The VIC is very expensive for interrupt disables) and that
the current Linux Voyager Subarchitecture still makes partial use of the
scheme.

James


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/