[patch 1/3] mutex subsystem: fix additions to the ARM atomic.h

[Nicolas Pitre]

The original patch added new definitions to include/asm-arm/atomic.h 
inside the #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 and therefore they were 
unavailable on non ARMv6 builds.  Move them outside that #if.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>

---

Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-arm/atomic.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-arm/atomic.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-arm/atomic.h
@@ -99,19 +99,6 @@ static inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_
 	return oldval;
 }
 
-#define atomic_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new))
-
-/*
- * Pull in the generic wrappers for atomic_dec_call_if_negative() and
- * atomic_inc_call_if_nonpositive().
- *
- * TODO: implement optimized primitives instead, or leave the generic
- * implementation in place, or use the ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_MUTEX_FASTPATH
- * mechanism to override the generic mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock()
- * functions.
- */
-#include <asm-generic/atomic-call-if.h>
-
 static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long mask, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	unsigned long tmp, tmp2;
@@ -188,6 +175,19 @@ static inline void atomic_clear_mask(uns
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ */
 
+#define atomic_xchg(v, new) (xchg(&((v)->counter), new))
+
+/*
+ * Pull in the generic wrappers for atomic_dec_call_if_negative() and
+ * atomic_inc_call_if_nonpositive().
+ *
+ * TODO: implement optimized primitives instead, or leave the generic
+ * implementation in place, or use the ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_MUTEX_FASTPATH
+ * mechanism to override the generic mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock()
+ * functions.
+ */
+#include <asm-generic/atomic-call-if.h>
+
 static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
 {
 	int c, old;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/