Re: [PATCH] ipw2200 stack reduction

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi,

On 12/29/05, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well you could do that if you wanted, but 500 bytes of dynamic
> allocation is not a big issue. But it could be an optimization on top of
> this patch, indeed. The downside is that you then have to do 2
> allocations for each command, so whether it would be a win or not I
> don't know.

The allocation shouldn't make much difference but for the implicit
memset() smaller size is a win maybe?

                                Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/