Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi,

On 12/30/05, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Attached is a variant that was refreshed against 2.6.15-rc7 and fixes
> the logical bug that your compile error fix made ;)
>
> It should be cachep->objsize not csizep->cs_size.

Isn't there any other way to do this patch other than making kzalloc()
and kstrdup() inline? I would like to see something like this in the
mainline but making them inline is not acceptable because they
increase kernel text a lot.

                       Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/