Re: 2.6.15-rc7: known regressions

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon Jan 02 2006 - 16:31:59 EST


On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:46:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.15-rc7 compared to 2.6.14.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you was declared guilty for a breakage or in any other way involved
> with one or more of these issues.

[ . . . ]

> Subject : BUG: spinlock recursion on 2.6.14-mm2 when oprofiling
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/18/95
> Submitter : Wu Fengguang <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Handled-By : "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Status : unknown, reported against -mm, already fixed in -mm
> (make-rcu-task_struct-safe-for-oprofile.patch)
> Is this bug present in Linus' tree?

No, this bug is not present in Linus's tree.

Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/