RE: Latency traces I cannot interpret (sa1100, 2.6.15-rc7-rt1)

[Daniel Walker]

On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 08:57 +0100, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
>          
>   <idle>-0     0D...    1us+: preempt_schedule_irq (svc_preempt)
>   <idle>-0     0....    5us!: default_idle (cpu_idle)
>   <idle>-0     0D..1 8700us+: asm_do_IRQ (c021da48 1a 0)

Your trace appears to be showing an actual latency of 300us . The trace
starts at 8700us . The default_idle line above is showing interrupts are
enable, and preemption is enabled . So the tracing code really should be
ignoring the default_idle line since there is no reason to be tracing. 

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/