Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers

[Antonio Vargas]

On 1/2/06, Grant Coady <grant_lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:49:06 +0100, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Maybe the right approach is to start rejecting in reviews new code that
> >uses inline inappropriately. (where "inappropriate" sort of is "more
> >than 3 lines of C unless there is some constant-optimizes-away trick")
>
> Well, I can own up to half a dozen inlines in a .c file, CodingStyle
> suggests to convert macros to static inline, so I did:
>
> /* adm9240 internally scales voltage measurements */
> static const u16 nom_mv[] = { 2500, 2700, 3300, 5000, 12000, 2700 };
>

[snip some static inline functons]

>
> Are these typical targets for non-inline?

according to the latest flamewars, maybe it would be better
to just turn the #defines into static functions instead on static inlines...
guess even better would be to just get CodingStyle fixed ASAP ;)

--
Greetz, Antonio Vargas aka winden of network

http://wind.codepixel.com/
windNOenSPAMntw@xxxxxxxxx
thesameasabove@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Every day, every year
you have to work
you have to study
you have to scene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/