Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
From: Marcelo Tosatti
Date: Wed Jan 04 2006 - 07:29:54 EST
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:18:01PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 20:40, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > We suspected that the TASK_INTERACTIVE() logic in kernel/sched.c would
> > be moving some processes directly to the active list, thus starving some
> > others. So we set the nice value of all 48 processes to "nice +19" to
> > disable TASK_INTERACTIVE() and the starvation is gone. However with +19
> > it becomes impossible to use the box interactively while the test runs,
> > which is the case with the default "0" nice value.
> >
> > Are there significant changes between v2.6.11 -> v2.6.14 aimed at fixing
> > this problem?
>
> The SCHED_BATCH policy Ingo has implemented should help just such a problem.
Yeap, he sent me the patch (which I promised to test), but still haven't.
Will do ASAP.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/