Re: d_instantiate_unique / NFS inode leakage?

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:26:47AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >    Searching for inode leakage in NFS code (seen in 2.6.14 and 2.6.15 at least,
> >    have not tried earlier versions), I see suspicious place in
> >    d_instantiate_unique (the only user happens to be NFS).
> >    There if we have found aliased dentry that we return, inode reference is
> >    not dropped and inode is not attached anywhere, so it seems the reference
> >    to inode is leaked in that case.
> Yep, that looks like it ought to be the correct behaviour. Could you
> please also add a note to this effect in the DocBook header for
> d_instantiate_unique?

Sure.

--- fs/dcache.c.orig	2006-01-05 02:28:57.000000000 +0200
+++ fs/dcache.c	2006-01-05 10:04:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -808,10 +808,14 @@ void d_instantiate(struct dentry *entry,
  *
  * Fill in inode information in the entry. On success, it returns NULL.
  * If an unhashed alias of "entry" already exists, then we return the
- * aliased dentry instead.
+ * aliased dentry instead and drop one reference to inode.
  *
  * Note that in order to avoid conflicts with rename() etc, the caller
  * had better be holding the parent directory semaphore.
+ *
+ * This also assumes that the inode count has been incremented
+ * (or otherwise set) by the caller to indicate that it is now
+ * in use by the dcache.
  */
 struct dentry *d_instantiate_unique(struct dentry *entry, struct inode *inode)
 {
@@ -838,6 +842,7 @@ struct dentry *d_instantiate_unique(stru
 		dget_locked(alias);
 		spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
 		BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(alias));
+		iput(inode);
 		return alias;
 	}
 	list_add(&entry->d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);

Bye,
    Oleg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/