Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> I think it's a mistake to interleave this data into the C source. It's
> expensive and tedious to change relative to its volatility.

I don't believe it is actually all _that_ volatile. Yes, it would be a 
huge issue _initially_, but the incremental effects shouldn't be that big, 
or there is something wrong with the approach.

> What I was proposing was something like, say, arch/i386/popularity.lst, 
> which would simply contain a list of the most popular n% of functions 
> sorted by popularity. As text, of course.

I suspect that would certainlty work for pure function-based popularity, 
and yes, it has the advantage of being simple (especially for something 
that ends up being almost totally separated from the compiler: if we're 
using this purely to modify link scripts etc with special tools).

But what about the unlikely/likely conditional hints that we currently do 
by hand? How are you going to sanely maintain a list of those without 
doing that in source code?

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/