Re: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Thu Jan 05 2006 - 18:25:57 EST
On Thursday, January 5, 2006 3:11 pm, Matt Mackall wrote:
> I'm still not sure about in-source annotations for popularity. My
> suspicion is that it's just too workload-dependent, and a given
> author's workload will likely be biased towards their code.
To some extent that's true, but like Linus implied with his "5% work gets
us 80% there" I think there are a ton of obvious cases, e.g. kmalloc,
alloc_pages, interrupt handling, etc. that could be marked right away
and put into a frequently used section.
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/