Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity

[Jan Engelhardt]

>> > If you have sound device without this soft mixing is moved to user space 
>> > .. but  applications do not need know about this even now because all
>> > neccessary details are handled on library level. Is it ?
>> > So question is: why the hell *ALL* mixing details are not moved to kernel 
>> > space to SIMPLE and NOT GROWING abstraction ?
>> 
>> Because many people believe that the softmix in the kernel space is
>> evil.
>>
>This is the usual argument against kernel level mixing. Somebody has once 
>said that all this is evil. However this is not necessarily correct.
>

I'm going with "is evil". Better let userspace have a segfault than a kernel
oops. I am having quite a moody feeling when running even my own things like
http://alphagate.hopto.org/quad_dsp/

>Kernel mixing is not rocket science. All you need to do is picking a 
>sample from the output buffers of each of the applications, sum them 
>together (with some volume scaling) and feed the result to the physical 
>device. Ok, handling different sample formats/rates makes it much more 
>difficult but that could be done in the library level.



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/