Re: ptrace denies access to EFLAGS_RF

From: Chuck Ebbert
Date: Fri Jan 06 2006 - 11:12:04 EST


In-Reply-To: <20060106140217.GD7676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 at 06:02:17 -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:


> To my surprise, applying the same fix to the x86_64 does not
> solve the problem on my Opteron box. I verified that the
> offset (144) matches with what the kernel is expecting.
> Somehow the RF is lost or not set in the proper location.
> I cannot make forward progress once I reach the breakpoint.


I sent this to Andi this morning. Does it work for you?

Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c | 9 ++++++---
arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c | 9 ++++++---
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.15-64a.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
+++ 2.6.15-64a/arch/x86_64/ia32/ptrace32.c
@@ -28,9 +28,12 @@
#include <asm/i387.h>
#include <asm/fpu32.h>

-/* determines which flags the user has access to. */
-/* 1 = access 0 = no access */
-#define FLAG_MASK 0x44dd5UL
+/*
+ * Determines which flags the user has access to [1 = access, 0 = no access].
+ * Prohibits changing ID(21), VIP(20), VIF(19), VM(17), IOPL(12-13), IF(9).
+ * Also masks reserved bits (31-22, 15, 5, 3, 1).
+ */
+#define FLAG_MASK 0x54dd5UL

#define R32(l,q) \
case offsetof(struct user32, regs.l): stack[offsetof(struct pt_regs, q)/8] = val; break
--- 2.6.15-64a.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ 2.6.15-64a/arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -36,9 +36,12 @@
* in exit.c or in signal.c.
*/

-/* determines which flags the user has access to. */
-/* 1 = access 0 = no access */
-#define FLAG_MASK 0x44dd5UL
+/*
+ * Determines which flags the user has access to [1 = access, 0 = no access].
+ * Prohibits changing ID(21), VIP(20), VIF(19), VM(17), IOPL(12-13), IF(9).
+ * Also masks reserved bits (63-22, 15, 5, 3, 1).
+ */
+#define FLAG_MASK 0x54dd5UL

/* set's the trap flag. */
#define TRAP_FLAG 0x100UL
--
Chuck
Currently reading: _Thud!_ by Terry Pratchett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/