Re: [rfc][patch] Avoid taking global tasklist_lock for singlethreadedprocess at getrusage()

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:

> +	need_lock = !(p == current && thread_group_empty(p));

Isnt 

need_lock = (p != current || !thread_group_empty(b))

clearer?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/