Re: 2.6.15-git2: CONFIGFS_FS shows up as M/y choice, help says "if unsure, say N"
From: Kyle Moffett
Date: Fri Jan 06 2006 - 16:45:24 EST
On Jan 06, 2006, at 16:39, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:10:13PM +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
===========
Userspace-driven configuration filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL)
(CONFIGFS_FS)
[M/y/?] (NEW)
Both sysfs and configfs can and should exist together on the same
system. One is not a replacement for the other.
If unsure, say N.
===========
I think I'll say M - for now ;)
Sure, if you want to play with configfs you should. Most users
probably have no interest in helping develop/debug it, so the
decomendation makes perfect sense.
I think his point is that his options are [M/y/?], (IE: No N), which
means that he's using something that depends on configfs. The
documentation should probably be updated to indicate that there are
such things.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible
-- Alan Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/