RE: FAT and Microsoft patent?

[Roger Heflin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> linux-os (Dick Johnson)
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:32 AM
> To: Christopher Friesen
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: FAT and Microsoft patent?
> 
> 
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> 
> > According to various sources, the USPTO has ruled that Microsoft's 
> > patent on FAT is valid.
> >
> > Does this impact Linux?  Will we have to remove the filesystem?
> >
> > Chris
> 
> You mean the expired patent circa 1980 for their first use of 
> this technology? This is 2006, 26 years later. Patents don't 
> run forever, you know. That's the reason why it has become 
> the 'universal' file- system, not because it's a good 
> file-system, but because it's now in the public domain due to 
> expiration.
> 
> And, can you cite the 'various sources'. They seem to be like 
> spooks under the bridge, completely without merit.

The patent upheld is for long filenames on a FAT filesystem, not
for FAT in general.

Not a major thing to go without.

It would be nice it the original poster would have done 30 seconds
more research before posting.

                         Roger

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/