Re: [PATCH 2/2] hugetlb: synchronize alloc with page cache insert

From: William Lee Irwin III
Date: Wed Jan 11 2006 - 20:04:07 EST


On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 04:40:37PM -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> What if two processes fault on the same page and races with find_lock_page(),
> both find page not in the page cache. The process won the race proceed to
> allocate last hugetlb page. While the other will exit with SIGBUS.
> In theory, both processes should be OK.

This is supposed to fix the incarnation of that as a preexisting
problem, but you're right, there is no fallback or retry for the case
of hugepage queue exhaustion. For some reason I saw a phantom page
allocator fallback in the hugepage allocator changes.

Looks like back to the drawing board for this pair of patches, though
I'd be more than happy to get a solution to this.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/