David Lang wrote:On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 14:05 -0800, David Lang wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 thockin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:18:35PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
Lee, the last time I saw this discussion I thought it was
identified that
the multiple cores (or IIRC the multiple chips in a SMP
motherboard) would
only get out of sync when power management calls were made (hlt or
switching the c-state). IIRC the workaround that was posted then
was to
just disable these in the kernel build.
not using 'hlt' when idling means that you spend 10s of Watts more
power
on mostly idle systems.
true, but for people who need better time accruacy then the other
workaround this may be very acceptable.
1/4 KW / day for time synchronisation.
The power company would love that.
more precisely 1/4 KW Hour / day
$0.01 - $0.02/day (I had to lookup the current rates)
they probably won't notice.
Well, wait until there's AMD based dual core x86_64 laptops out there
(this email being written on a single core x86_64 one). I can already
see the faces of the unhappy future owners being told "use idle=poll"
when on battery and anyway going deaf by fan noise.
(/me ducks and runs)