Re: -mm seems significanty slower than mainline on kernbench

[Con Kolivas]

On Sunday 15 January 2006 11:05, Peter Williams wrote:
> Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >> Attached is a new patch to fix the excessive idle problem.  This patch
> >> takes a new approach to the problem as it was becoming obvious that
> >> trying to alter the load balancing code to cope with biased load was
> >> harder than it seemed.
> >>
> >> This approach reverts to the old load values but weights them
> >> according to tasks' bias_prio values.  This means that any assumptions
> >> by the load balancing code that the load generated by a single task is
> >> SCHED_LOAD_SCALE will still hold.  Then, in find_busiest_group(), the
> >> imbalance is scaled back up to bias_prio scale so that move_tasks()
> >> can move biased load rather than tasks.
> >
> > OK, this one seems to fix the issue that I had, AFAICS. Congrats, and
> > thanks,
>
> Terrific, thanks for testing.
>
> Con,
> 	Attached is a cleaned up version of this patch against 2.6.15-mm4 with
> some (hopefully helpful) comments added.

Great! Well done.

> Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/