Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?

[Justin Piszcz]

Also, some people mentioned tuning, I used 8192 as the w/r size it then 
took 15 seconds, with 65535 it took 28 seconds.

I wonder how much faster NFS over TCP would be, or if NFS in the kernel is 
the problem itself?

Will try later thanks.

FTP seems to be the winner for now:

<--- 226 8.927 seconds (measured here), 78.31 Mbytes per second
733045488 bytes transferred in 9 seconds (77.08M/s)


On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Phil Oester wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:07:02PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > I suppose I should try NFS with TCP, yes?
>
> Precisely.
>
> Phil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/