Re: [PATCH][2.6.16-rc1] TPM: tpm_bios needs securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY)
From: Jerome Pinot
Date: Tue Jan 17 2006 - 11:59:40 EST
Hi,
>It seems that "TPM Hardware Support" (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on
>"Enable different security models" (CONFIG_SECURITY).
This does the trick but your patch formatting is broken. This one
applies cleanly against 2.6.16-rc1.
from: Rui Saraiva
tpm_bios (CONFIG_TCG_TPM) depends on securityfs (CONFIG_SECURITY).
Signed-off-by: Rui Saraiva <rmps@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jerome Pinot <ngc891@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff -Naur a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig 2006-01-17 16:12:37.000000000 +0000
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig 2006-01-17 16:13:05.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
config TCG_TPM
tristate "TPM Hardware Support"
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL
+ depends on EXPERIMENTAL && SECURITY
---help---
If you have a TPM security chip in your system, which
implements the Trusted Computing Group's specification,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/