Re: Rationale for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK?
From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Tue Jan 24 2006 - 04:14:09 EST
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 10:08 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > the situation is messy; I can see some value in the hack Ted proposed to
> > just bump the rlimit automatically at an mlockall-done-by-root.. but to
> > be fair it's a hack :(
>
> As all other rlimits are honored even if you are root, it looks not orthogonal
> to disregard an existing RLIMIT_MEMLOCK rlimit if you are root.
that's another solution; give root a higher rlimit by default for this.
It's also a bit messy, but a not-unreasonable default behavior.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/