Re: More information on scsi_cmd_cache leak... (bisect)

[Mike Christie]

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:06 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> > It does not have anything to do with this in scsi_io_completion does it?
> >
> >         if (blk_complete_barrier_rq(q, req, good_bytes >> 9))
> >                 return;
> >
> > For that case the scsi_cmnd does not get freed. Does it come back around 
> > again and get released from a different path?
>
>
> It looks such a likely candidate, doesn't it.  Unfortunately, Tejun Heo
> removed that code around 6 Jan (in [BLOCK] update SCSI to use new
> blk_ordered for barriers), so if it is that, then the latest kernels
> should now not be leaking.

Oh, I thought the reports were for 2.6.15 and below which has that 
scsi_io_completion test. Have there been reports for this with 
2.6.16-rc1 too?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/