Re: [PATCH] Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt: Clarification

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 01:50:16AM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> 
> This reflects the clarification made on what patches the -stable team 
> accepts. This applies cleanly to the 2.6.16-rc1 kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Wolber <chuckw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> --- a/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt     2006-01-16 23:44:47.000000000 -0800
> +++ b/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt     2006-01-29 01:45:44.000000000 -0800
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>     whitespace cleanups, etc).
>   - It must be accepted by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
>   - It must follow the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
> + - Patches for any 2.6 stable kernel release will be considered.

No, this isn't true.

People complained that we immediatly abandonded the last stable kernel
when a new one came out, so we said we would take patches for a bit on
the last series if people wanted to send them.

That's all, it's not some confusing thing, and we are very much not
going to accept patches for "any" kernel release.

So no, I'm not going to accept this.

thanks,

greg k-h

> 
> 
>  Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/