Re: [PATCH] Busy inodes after unmount, be more verbose in generic_shutdown_super

[Jan Blunck]

On Mon, Jan 23, Kirill Korotaev wrote:

> Jan, I still have not heard a single comment about what's wrong with 
> it... I would really appreciate if you provide me one.
> 

Sorry for the delay. I had to fix a totally bogus patch (mine ;).

The problem with your patch is that it hides too early mntput's. Think about
following situation:

 mntput(path->mnt);   // too early mntput()
 dput(path->dentry);

Assuming that in-between this sequence someone unmounts the file system, your
patch will wait for this dput() to finish before it proceeds with unmounting
the file system. I think this isn't what we want.

Regards,
	Jan

-- 
Jan Blunck                                               jblunck@xxxxxxx
SuSE LINUX AG - A Novell company
Maxfeldstr. 5                                          +49-911-74053-608
D-90409 Nürnberg                                      http://www.suse.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/