Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency

[Herbert Xu]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:32:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> update: with all of Herbert's fixes i havent gotten these yet - so maybe 
> the validator was not producing a false positive, but perhaps the 
> inet6_destroy_sock()->sk_dst_reset() thing was causing the messages?

Maybe.  But in that case shouldn't the validator show that code-path?

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/