Re: [ 01/10] [Suspend2] kernel/power/modules.h

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On Thursday 02 February 2006 07:45, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 23:01, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > I think we can call these suspend_{get|set}_modules instead i.e.
> > > without the extra '2'.
>
> On 2/1/06, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I wanted to avoid confusion with similar routine names Pavel might use.
> > For example, he has a resume_setup and I have a resume2_setup.
>
> Is that necessary for the mainline, though? We have only one suspend
> in the kernel, not "Pavel suspend" and "Nigel suspend", right?

Well, I'd love that to be true, but I don't believe Pavel's going to roll over 
and say "Ok Nigel. You've got a better implementation. I'll submit patches to 
remove mine." I might be wrong, and I hope I will be, but I fear they're 
going to coexist for a while.

Regards,

Nigel
-- 
See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info.
http://www.suspend2.net                IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature