Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Christopher Friesen]

Willy Tarreau wrote:

> Given the past
> experience of 2.4 and the time I can spend on kernel work, I would
> not even consider basing anything on 2.6 before something like 2.6.20-25,
> when it will hopefully settle down a bit.

Unfortunately there are many times when this simply isn't an option. 
I'm currently working on boards that simply are not supported on 2.4. 
Thus either we need to track 2.6, or else we need to pay someone to do 
it for us and hope they do a good job.

Of course what actually happens is that you pick a kernel version 
(hopefully you pick well) and then backport fixes.  Upgrading 
continuously simply isn't an option, as we have multiple vendors 
providing BSPs, drivers, patches, etc. and they're all supported only 
for that specific kernel version.  We can really only upversion the 
kernel once a year or so, if that often.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/