Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation

From: Paul Jackson
Date: Mon Feb 06 2006 - 03:20:59 EST


Ingo wrote:
> Modifying hundreds
> of apps, some of which might be legacy, seems impractical - and the
> access pattern might very much depend on the project it is used in.

Well said.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/