Re: [PATCH] new tty buffering locking fix

[Paul Fulghum]

Alan Cox wrote:
> Thats going to hurt memory consumption in the worst cases.

I'll gather some accounting info tomorrow,
and consider the more pathological cases.

> Might be better to document the sane behaviour and enforce it ?

That was my first thought, which prompted my
initial patch of the hvc drivers.

Requiring a call to schedule processing of tty data
after preallocating buffer space is not obvious,
and could result in scheduling work when there is no
data to process.

This semantic twist introduced by my first locking patch
is a hazard for driver writers, and would require an audit
of existing drivers (as demonstrated by Olaf's report).

--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/