Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff

[Keith Owens]

"Chen, Kenneth W" (on Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:40:13 -0800) wrote:
>Adrian Bunk wrote on Tuesday, February 07, 2006 5:20 PM
>> You could ask the same question for NUMA:
>> Select generic system type does not mean NUMA systems are only choice I 
>> can have. What's wrong with having an option that works just fine?
>
>Please read more ia64 arch specific code ...
>
>CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC is a platform type choice, you can have platform
>type of DIG, HPZX1, SGI SN2, or all of the above.  DIG platform depends
>on ACPI, thus need ACPI on.  SGI altix is a numa box, thus, need NUMA
>on.  NEC, Fujitsu build numa machines with ACPI SRAT table, thus, need
>ACPI_NUMA on.  When you build a kernel to boot on all platforms, you
>have no choice but to turn on all of the above.  Processor type and SMP
>is different from platform type.  It does not have any dependency on
>platform type.  They are orthogonal choice.
>
>
>> Keith said IA64_GENERIC should select all the options required in
>> order to run on all the IA64 platforms out there.
>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> This is what my patch does.
>
>You patch does more than what you described and is wrong.  Selecting
>platform type should not be tied into selecting SMP nor should it tied
>with processor type, nor should it tied with ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE.  All
>of them are orthogonal and independent.

Blame me for the SMP bit.  I have a dim, distant memory that Intel
required all IA64 boxes to be SMP, but I could be wrong.  Also it is
almost pointless to do a generic build which pulls in NUMA etc.,
without also including SMP.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/