The naming of at()s is a difficult matter

[H. Peter Anvin]

I have noticed that the new ...at() system calls are named in what
appears to be a completely haphazard fashion.  In Unix system calls,
an f- prefix means it operates on a file descriptor; the -at suffix (a
prefix would have been more consistent, but oh well) similarly
indicates it operates on a (directory fd, pathname) pair.

However, some system calls, in particular fchownat, futimesat,
fchmodat and faccessat add the f- prefix for what appears to be
absolutely no good reason.  Logically, these system calls should be
named chownat, utimesat, chmodat, and accessat.

I understand some of this braindamage comes from Solaris, but some of
these calls do not.  We should avoid it if at all possible, and I
would recommend at least introducing aliases with the sane names.

        -hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/