Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix file counting

[Eric Dumazet]

Dipankar Sarma a écrit :
> Eric,
>
> Going by your patch, I converted my nr-files patch to use
> percpu counters - except that I just used the existing
> percpu counter code. This patch is untested, just for comments.
> If you agree with the approach, we can go with it. I will
> get some benchmark numbers measured on a 16-CPU box.
>
> Thanks
> Dipankar
>
>
>
> The way we do file struct accounting is not very suitable for batched
> freeing. For scalability reasons, file accounting was constructor/destructor
> based. This meant that nr_files was decremented only when
> the object was removed from the slab cache. This is
> susceptible to slab fragmentation. With RCU based file structure,
> consequent batched freeing and a test program like Serge's,
> we just speed this up and end up with a very fragmented slab -
>
> llm22:~ # cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
> 587730  0       758844
>
> At the same time, I see only a 2000+ objects in filp cache.
> The following patch I fixes this problem. 
>
> This patch changes the file counting by removing the filp_count_lock.
> Instead we use a separate percpu counter, nr_files, for now and all
> accesses to it are through get_nr_files() api. In the sysctl
> handler for nr_files, we populate files_stat.nr_files before returning
> to user.
>
> Counting files as an when they are created and destroyed (as opposed
> to inside slab) allows us to correctly count open files with RCU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>
>
>
>  fs/dcache.c          |    2 -
>  fs/file_table.c      |   80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  include/linux/file.h |    2 -
>  include/linux/fs.h   |    2 +
>  kernel/sysctl.c      |    5 ++-
>  net/unix/af_unix.c   |    2 -
>  6 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

Hi Dipankar

I believe your patch is good.

However there is a bug in get_empty_filp() :

if security_file_alloc(f) returns TRUE : The goto fail_sec;  is done and 
fail_sec: does a file_free(f)

This means an extra percpu_counter_mod(&nr_files, -1L); will be done.

So I think you must apply this patch too :

 fail_sec:
-	file_free(f);
+	kmem_cache_free(filp_cachep, f);
 fail:
 	return NULL;


(Ie no need for a delayed free done via rcu here, just a direct 
kmem_cache_free() call)

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/