Re: [patch] i386: fix singlestepping though a syscall

[Paulo Marques]

Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> [...]
> Yes, that works.  I was afraid to try it because of unknown side-effects
> but one of those may be that it fixes Paolo's debugger problem.  The C
> program I was testing with is enclosed and I can even (with care) debug
> it with gdb passing through SIGTRAP and step through the signal handler.
>
> Paolo, can you try this patch for your debugger problem?
    ^
Paulo, please ;)

Humm.... I've already found a way to make the debugger work (see th 
other thread) and at a first glance it seems unrelated to this. So I 
suspect I wouldn't gain much by testing it.

If you think it is worth doing it anyway, it won't be that much trouble 
to test yet another kernel, so I can certainly do it tonight...

--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com

Pointy-Haired Boss: I don't see anything that could stand in our way.
           Dilbert: Sanity? Reality? The laws of physics?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/