Re: [patch] timer-irq-driven soft-watchdog, cleanups

[Ingo Molnar]

* Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > If you still get warnings even with this patch applied, then my very
> > strong suspicion is that the 10+ seconds delays in the IDE code are
> > real, and not false-positives. If there are such places then the minimum
> > we should do is to document them via touch_softlockup_watchdog() ...
> > even if you "knew" about such places already.
> 
> Fully agreed, where is the patch?

it's included in the mail you replied to :)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/