Re: [PATCH]console:UTF-8 mode compatibility fixes

[Adam Tla/lka]

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:24:26AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Adam TlaĹ?ka wrote:
> 
> >Maybe I should remember all bytes of the UTF-sequence to use their 
> >values as a last resort char in case of malformed sequence and 0xfffd
> >not defined?
> 
> Please don't do that. Display question marks instead in the case when 
> 0xfffd is not defined.

But this is the normal console behaviour in case of non existing replacement
glyph for some char. I just not changed it. Anyway if you have no '?' glyph
at '?' char code position you get some different char on the screen.
Replacement glyph should always be defined as I said before,
so this part of code could be easilly removed but I do not really know
if this assumption is true now.

Regards 
-- 
Adam Tlałka      mailto:atlka@xxxxxxxxx    ^v^ ^v^ ^v^
System  & Network Administration Group           ~~~~~~
Computer Center,  Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland
PGP public key:   finger atlka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/