Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 2/5] [pm] Add state field to pm_message_t (tohold actual state device is in)

[Patrick Mochel]

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Hi!
>
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> > index 5be87ba..a7324ea 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct device;
> >
> >  typedef struct pm_message {
> >  	int event;
> > +	u32 state;
> >  } pm_message_t;
>
> We have had enough problems with u32s before... What about
> char *, and pass real state names?

I certainly agree that is better in an ideal implementation. But, the
intent of the patches was not to fix the infrastructure; it was to fix the
interface to be compatible with previous behavior (while accounting for
changes made in the area that happened in the process of breaking it).

Thanks,


	Pat

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/