Re: suspend2 review [was Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)]

[Pavel Machek]

On Ne 19-02-06 19:35:36, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sunday 19 February 2006 18:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6.15-1/drivers/input/serio/serio.c  2006-01-03 15:08:26.000000000 +1000
> > +++ build-2.6.15.1/drivers/input/serio/serio.c  2006-01-23 21:38:28.000000000 +1000
> > @@ -314,6 +314,12 @@
> >  
> >                 serio_remove_duplicate_events(event);
> >                 serio_free_event(event);
> > +
> > +               if (unlikely(todo_list_active())) {
> > +                       up(&serio_sem);
> > +                       try_todo_list();
> > +                       down(&serio_sem);
> > +               }
> >         }
> >  
> >         up(&serio_sem);
> > 
> > What is this?
> > 
> 
> I think it is a leftover from when serio and gameport cores were not
> "swsusp friendly" and were not releasing semaphore untill all pending
> messages have been processed. If you remember swsusp used to fail in
> this case. It can be safely dropped now.
> 
> Overall as you noted alot of changes in Nigel's patch are useable outside
> of swsuspend2 so it's intrusiveness is not as big as you making it appear.

Yes, some of them are usaeable outside. But many of them were
attempted outside and vetoed for whatever reason :-(.
								Pavel
-- 
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/