Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

[Pavel Machek]

On Út 21-02-06 06:44:34, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:08, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Maybe you feel you are in a power position because your code happened
> > > to enter the kernel first, so you few you can have veto power over all
> > > other contenders.  It sometimes works that way, but only up to a
> >
> > Unfortunately, I do not need to veto suspend2. It is so complex that
> > it vetoes itself. Last time akpm stopped it, IIRC.
> 
> I'm going to let most of the last 8 hours' emails float by without reply, but 
> think I should comment here.

Thanks.

> I don't believe I've ever seen an email from Andrew stopping a merge, and I 
> shouldn't have, because I've never asked him to merge it. Being the 
> perfectionist that I am, I've sought to get it as stable, reliable and 
> comment-clean as I reasonably could before merging.

I believe I seen reply to that effect (saying "it is working and fast
is not enough for merge", or something like that.

Anyway, please Cc me on merge attempts...
								Pavel
-- 
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/