Re: [PATCH 1/2] iptables 32bit compat layer

[Andi Kleen]

Mishin Dmitry <dim@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello,
> 
> This patch set extends current iptables compatibility layer in order to get
> 32bit iptables to work on 64bit kernel. Current layer is insufficient 
> due to alignment checks both in kernel and user space tools.
> 
> This patch introduces base compatibility interface for other ip_tables modules

Nice. But some issues with the implementation


+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
+#define is_current_32bits() (current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_IA32)

This should be is_compat_task(). And we don't do such ifdefs
in generic code.  And what you actually need here is a 
is_compat_task_with_funny_u64_alignment() (better name sought)

So I would suggest you add macros for that to the ia64 and x86-64
asm/compat.hs and perhaps a ARCH_HAS_FUNNY_U64_ALIGNMENT #define in there.

+	ret = 0;
+	switch (convert) {
+		case COMPAT_TO_USER:
+			pt = (struct ipt_entry_target *)target;

etc. that looks ugly. why can't you just define different functions
for that?  We don't really need in kernel ioctl

+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+	down(&compat_ipt_mutex);
+#endif

Why does it need an own lock?

Overall the implementation looks very complicated. Are you sure
it wasn't possible to do this simpler?


-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/