Re: [2.6 patch] remove the CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_* options
From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Tue Feb 21 2006 - 12:54:45 EST
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:36:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I don't see any use case for the CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_* options:
> - they are only available if EMBEDDED
> - people using EMBEDDED will most likely also enable
> CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> - the default for -Os is to disable alignment
>
> In case someone is doing performance comparisons and discovers that the
> default settings gcc chooses aren't good, the only sane thing is to
> discuss whether it makes sense to change this, not through offering
> options to change this locally.
I leave it to other to judge if this is wortwhile or not - I have no
numbers to back up either with or without.
It is though a nice cleaning effort in the Makefile.
But if we back-out this then cc-option-aling should go as well,
including description in Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/