Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > It is doable - I'm doing it now, but am thinking about reverting part of the 
> > code to use pbes again. If you're going to look at using bitmaps in place of 
> > pbes, me changing would be a waste of time. Do you want me to hold off for a 
> > while? (I'll happily do that, as I have far more than enough to keep me 
> > occupied at the moment anyway).
> 
> Well, I'd say so. :-)
> 
> Frankly, I didn't think of dropping PBEs right now, but in the long run
> that's worth considering, IMO.  The advantage of PBEs is that they are easy to
> handle in the assembly parts, but apart from this they are a bit wasteful
> (not very much, though).

Of course it will depend on what patch looks like, but changing
assembly parts is hard -- you have to change all the architectures,
and better not make any mistake.

> The fact that we use page flags to store some suspend/resume-related
> information is a big disadvantage in my view, and I'd like to get rid of that
> in the future.  In principle we could use a bitmap, or rather two of them,
> to store the same information independently of the page flags, and
> if we use bitmaps for this purpose, we can use them also instead of
> PBEs.

Well, we "only" use 2 bits... :-).
								Pavel
-- 
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/