Re: 2.6.15-rt17

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 17:50 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote:
> I didn't know anyone looked at my patch! I am ofcourse happy about it :-)

Was just delayed due to other work in progress.

> That was why I had _reversed_ the lock ordering relative to normal in the
> original patch: First lock task->pi_lock. Assign lock. Lock
> lock->wait_lock. Then unlock task->pi_lock. Now it is safe to refer to
> lock. To avoid deadlocks I used _raw_spin_trylock() when locking the 2.
> lock.

Stupid me. I messed that one up. Should show up in the next -rt

Thanks

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/