Re: MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice?

[Chris Boot]

thunder7@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Chris Boot <bootc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:00:10PM +0000
>   
> > Hi all,
> >
> > [4295106.474000] raid6: mmxx2     2500 MB/s
> > [4295106.521000] raid6: sse1x2    2339 MB/s
> > [4295106.524000] raid6: using algorithm sse1x2 (2339 MB/s)
> > [4295106.531000] md: raid6 personality registered for level 6
> >
> > I just loaded the raid6 module for fun (might end up using it one day), and 
> > I was surprised at its choice of algorithm. By the messages above, I would 
> > have assumed it would choose the mmxx2 algorithm at 2500 MB/s instead of 
> > sse1x2 at the slightly slower 2339 MB/s. This is probably entirely expected 
> > behaviour, but why?
> >
> >     
> Because it is more cache-efficient (allows the other code to run at a
> higher speed). This comes up now and again, perhaps these messages
> should be rephrased.
>   
I knew there would be a good reason for this, I just couldn't figure it 
out from those messages. That's a very good explanation indeed, and as 
you say, perhaps the messages should be updated.

Cheers,
Chris

--
Chris Boot
bootc@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/