Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:41:18PM -0800, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:19:34PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote:
> > If there's objectins to having struct msi_ops declared in pci.h, then I guess
> > we need to come up with another solution.
> 
> There are other transaction based interrupt subsystems that are typically
> arch specific (e.g. GSC device interrupts on PA-RISC). So far, MSI is the
> only generic one and that is clearly part of the PCI spec. 

Yes, that's fine.  But the core pci msi structures do not need to be
exported for the whole kernel to see, right?  That's my only point here.

pci.h is cluttered enough as it is :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/