Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] sched: activate SCHED BATCH expired

[Andreas Mohr]

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:36:10AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> I'm not attached to the style, just the feature. If you think it's warranted 
> I'll change it.

Seconded.

An even nicer way (this solution seems somewhat asymmetric) than

   prio_array_t *target = rq->active;
   if (batch_task(p))
     target = rq->expired;
   enqueue_task(p, target);

may be

   prio_array_t *target;
   if (batch_task(p))
     target = rq->expired;
   else
     target = rq->active;
   enqueue_task(p, target);

and thus (but this coding style may be considered overloaded):

   prio_array_t *target;
   target = batch_task(p) ?
	rq->expired : rq->active;
   enqueue_task(p, target);


But this discussion is clearly growing out of control now ;)

Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/