Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
From: Chuck Ebbert
Date: Fri Mar 17 2006 - 10:59:07 EST
In-Reply-To: <20060315102522.GA5926@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:25:22 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I agree with Zach here, the Xen hypervisor <-> kernel interface is
> not very nice. This proposal seems like a step forward althogh it'll
> probably need to go through a few iterations. Without and actually
> useable opensource hypevisor reference implementation it's totally
> unacceptable, though.
I'd like to see a test harness implementation that has no actual
hypervisor functionality and just implements the VMI calls natively.
This could be used to test the interface and would provide a nice
starting point for those who want to write a VMI hypervisor.
--
Chuck
"Penguins don't come from next door, they come from the Antarctic!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/