Re: [patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE

[Jan Engelhardt]

>
>Isn't there a runtime cost converting all "non-false" values to a unique "true" (i.e. converting non-zero values to one) ?
>

Somewhat. The answer is "yes, but depends on usage". If you just 
write

	_Bool x = filthy_action();
	if(x)

Then the compiler is smart enough to optimize 'x' away if it is not used 
somewhere else, therefore we do not pay a price for converting the return 
type of filthy_action (=int) to a _Bool.

The asm output for storing the result of filthy_action() [requires 
'volatile int x' in this small example]

	call strxcmp
	mov [ebp-4], eax

While making that a 'volatile _Bool x' makes it:

	call strxcmp
	test eax, eax
	setnz al
	mov [ebp-1], al

Makes me prefer typedef int bool over _Bool.


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/