Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative

[Parag Warudkar]

On Sunday 19 March 2006 07:00, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> Well its drifted a bit, however I submitted a number of patches here about
> two weeks ago to bring it back into line and hopefully make it HOTPLUG
> safe.
>
> The new set of patches pretty much make conservative's codebase identical
> to ondemands....as no one has posted back having used these or anything
> what am I to do?!

The codebase already seems identical to ondemand - Are your patches in 
2.6.16-rc6 or -mm? If they are - let me know which. If you posted them but 
they haven't yet made it into either -mm or mainline can you please post 
links to all your patches please? I can test them.

Why do we even have conservative and ondemand as two separate modules given 
they share huge amount of code - perhaps make conservative an optional 
behaviour of ondemand or alteast make a common lib which both use?

Thanks
Parag
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/